Thin-Airfoil Lift Calculator

In incompressible thin-airfoil theory the section lift coefficient is cl = 2π (α − α_L0), with angles in radians. Enter an angle of attack and, if the section is cambered, a zero-lift angle, and this page returns cl and the 2π-per-radian slope in per-degree form. An optional speed, density, and area turn that coefficient into a lift force. The theory does not predict stall.

A symmetric section or a flat plate has α_L0 = 0. A cambered airfoil has a negative zero-lift angle (it still makes lift at zero geometric angle). The default slope is the theoretical 2π per radian (about 0.1097 per degree).

Optional dimensional lift (leave blank to skip):

Results

Result

—

Advertisement
Ad slot — 728×90 desktop / 320×100 mobile

cl = 2π (α − α_L0)

Thin-airfoil theory, for an inviscid incompressible two-dimensional section, gives a constant lift-curve slope of 2π per radian and a lift coefficient cl = 2π (α − α_L0). Five degrees on a flat plate is therefore cl ≈ 0.548. Real sections are a little less steep (closer to 0.1 per degree) because of thickness and viscosity, and they stall; this page does not invent a stall angle. The aerodynamic center is at the quarter chord, and a flat plate has no quarter-chord pitching moment in the theory.

For a finite wing the slope is reduced by aspect ratio — see the aspect-ratio lift-slope calculator. To turn a force, speed, and area into a coefficient, or the other way around, use lift and drag coefficients.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Why is my measured slope less than 2π per radian?

Thickness, viscosity, and a finite span all reduce the slope. 2π is the inviscid, two-dimensional, infinitely thin limit.

What zero-lift angle should I use?

Zero for a symmetric section. For a cambered section, α_L0 is negative and comes from a catalog or a computation, not from this thin-plate default.

Does this predict stall?

No. Thin-airfoil theory has no stall. Stay well below the section’s published stall angle.